MUHAMMAD ISRAIL KHAN versus NIAMAT ALI KHAN
Sections 497 (5) and 561 constitute a penal code (XLV of 1860), section 324/148/149 pressure on terrorist activities (Special Courts) Act (XV of 1975), sections 5 and 6 bail, in the termination of the accused It was claimed that in the absence of any provision for cancellation of bail under the Terrorist Activities (Special Courts) Act 1975, once the accused's bail was granted, the T6 terrorist activities by any court, including the High Court. Cannot be canceled in the absence of an express bar to suppress (special) courts. The termination of the High Court's jurisdiction in the case of hair cancellation, Act 1975, High. The court can revoke the bail granted to the accused, the High Court has too many powers under 5 361A of the Code of Criminal Procedure, if it observes, it can prevent the court process from being abused. Any forum has committed some abortion of justice that does not apply to the laws or principles of the Superior Courts.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Tarbela lawyer