Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus MUHAMMAD YAQOOB

Prohibition (Enforcement of Head) Order 1979 Article 4 Criminal Procedure Code (V9 1898), Section 417 (1) The prosecution witnesses not only witnessed the heroin recovery but also arrested it shortly after the recovery memo. Was. The trial was proved and the chemical executor testified that the material recovered was heroin, statements of both witnesses were constant and according to the prosecution's case, the prosecutor's witnesses were under trial at trial. Unchecked and since his testimony was disputed, he had to accept the same, the credibility of which was not questioned by the trial court because the heroin recovery could not be doubted simply because. Especially when no one was involved in the rehabilitation process. The recovery was disclosed by the personal search of the accused, who was acquitted by the trial court for reasons not to be accepted by the judicial counsel, and was consequently set aside, alleging that he He was found guilty under Article 4 of the Prohibition (Enforcement Head) Order 1979 of possessing 10 grams of heroin and sentenced to two months. Since he has already faced a lengthy criminal trial attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Sangote lawyer