Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SINDH ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION versus NIAZ HUSSAIN


Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 of the Workers' Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (1) (n) and Schedule II, CL (xxviii) orders of the Tribunal to terminate proceedings under which the employee was a checker and Was found. In accordance with Schedule II's definition of Worker's Compensation Act, 1923, an attempt was made by employers to claim that the employee, who was originally a conductor, was later referred to as a traffic supervisor. Further employee conflict was developed. Did the traffic supervisor and the checker work the same and by the traffic supervisor it meant that he was a checker, employee, so he remained a worker and his case was not dismissed because of the evidence, the action. An order of inquiry, may not be approved by the tribunal

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
patent advocate from Bat Khela lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.