PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION versus S. ZAFAR EJAZ
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Sections O8 (2) and 15 (3) (E) dismissed the employees after they were dismissed for corruption because of their inquiry. It was reported that the employees were denied employment after receiving leave. , The job extended her leave for 17 days, but employees applied for a holiday extension, but not timely, although employees were accused of enjoying the holiday before it was approved. , But this was not a matter of corruption and rather a matter of approval for expansion. Employees were discharged, so ordered to be re-employed, but return benefits were denied because employees failed over time to approve the leave.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
