Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YAR versus CHAIRMAN, ZILA COUNCIL, BAHAWALNAGAR

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Retirement of an employee working in the District Council on the date of birth, entered in the service book, has been claimed by the Workman against his premature retirement. The employees' complaint was dismissed on the basis of jurisdiction by the Labor Court that the district council was not an industry. As an employee of the District Council, the worker shall be defined in accordance with the provisions of both the Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969, as well as West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders). ) The ordinance, 1968, will apply to low-paid employees of the District Council on which the Labor Court Forum is available. The date of birth of the worker in the column was entered as 1931, which is related to the height of the person concerned and not from the date of birth, however, in the relevant column, deleted by the dark gray matter or the Union Council. The certificate that shows the date of birth in the service book was not registered in the relevant column but was entered against the height column, especially when the entry against the corresponding column in the service box appears to be invalid. And equity rules are required. In the case of age, the benefit of the doubt should be given to the employee in the event of inconsistent or dubious service record, the employee's medical checkup report was available on record where his date of birth was shown 1942 when no other valid evidence was available. In the presence of a Medical Checkup Report, it would be deemed applicable that a labor court notice that the worker was punished based on his service record. top advocates from Nawab Shah lawyer