KHAN MUHAMMAD versus THE STATE
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 302/34 and the definition of 100 evidence were not the commission of the crime of the accused, the right to physical defense, but the purpose of the complaining party was to avenge the prosecution's testimony. Section 103, the CR was charged with a charge of violating the mandatory provisions of the PCC and was denied by the opportunity witness and interested witnesses investigating the matter with a patent bead drug, The accused was also hurt and has retaliated. The version of the incident and when both prescriptions were put on the defensive version, it was deemed appropriate that the breaks of the ribs and shoulders from the hands of the accused were sufficient for them to fear that the death could have been due to the accused. So, he used it. The right to defend their person and they were no more than that
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law firms from Diamer lawyer