MUHAMMAD NAWAZ versus STATE
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Law in Evidence (10 of 1984), Article 43 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Drugs Ordinance (LXXXIV of 1995), Section 9 The accused was in bail. , Neither before the sessions court nor in the request for bail, denied his relationship with the co-accused who was driving the car and his official gunman who was arrested on the spot and Huge quantities of heroin and marijuana were recovered, he said. Not only confessed to his crime but also explicitly asked the accused to transmit the prohibited material, in which the statements were acceptable. Evidence under section 43 of the law, testimony, in the car used for the 1984 alleged crime, an MNA plate was extracted that was stolen and the accused purchased it, and was being used with a counterfeit. The registration number was a member of the National Assembly of Pakistan and also a member of the Pakistan Narcotics Control Board and there was no cause for false allegations. The filing of the affidavit's affidavit by the witnesses can not be prosecuted at this time. Unless the police can investigate them. The accused, the first one, was connected to the commission of a crime that falls under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), CRPC: The bail was denied to the defendants [oath].
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Bat Khela lawyer