Find a Lawyer

ASIFA JAFFAR ALVI versus UNIVERSITY OF THE PUNJAB

Section 31 and 32 Final Professional MB, B Section (Revised Latest Scheme) Examination Regulations, Regulation 3 of the Board of Studies in Medical Medicine Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Regulations And the legality of the laws on the Touchstone of the Constitution, formulated under the Board of Studies in Medicine Wires of Reglan 3, Final Professional MB, B section (Revised latest scheme) Examination Rules, Section 31, Punjab Act, 1973. Candidate in the final Professional MB, B section secured 50 marks marks separately in the practical and clinical tests. He requirement, applicants were not required numbers, he did not pass such a test were announced, including the duration of courses, number of articles and papers for exams. Provided by the Law of the Board of Studies in Madison, which was enacted under Section 31 of the University of Punjab, there is no provision in the Constitution of Law Act, 1973 that the candidate should be referred to in Article 32, Punjab Act. In order to pass under the provisions of 1973, practical and clinical tests are required to obtain a separate 50% score, subject to the terms of this regulation. The University of Punjab Act, 1973, and the constitution, rules for specific matters may be made in it, so the rules should be made under the provisions of the Act and the Constitution, therefore, they could not prevail on either. They have to be compiled in the light of the Constitution and in the light of the rules of the last Professional MB, B section (Modified latest scheme) examinations, thus, Section 31, Punjab. immigration advocates email from Daud Khel lawyer