Find a Lawyer

YASIN versus THE STATE

Section 4 304, Parts I and II of the Evidence Act was heard under the Trial Court Act, which examined the testimony of the three prosecutor's witnesses, while the accused was not represented by a lawyer. Set by the court, the High Court directives but also because of the serious prejudice of the accused, the trial court also relied on the illegal file by consulting the police file, which was neither a piece of evidence on the record nor Nor was he placed before the accused when he was examined under section 342, witnesses of the CRPC prosecution admitted. The incident was not witnessed and they were attracted to the scene on the report of the blaze. The accused took serious and sudden provocations and also pleaded in his defense and his statement was the only statement available on the record. How the incident began, which seemed questionable and reasonable in the circumstances of the trial, the accused, in part, exceeded his right to self-defense, but had no intention of killing the victim. Or cause bodily injury because of his death conviction under Section 304, Part I, PPC Enough. Under Section 4304, Part II, PPC, the sentence of one and his life imprisonment was already reduced from his imprisonment by more than six years. advocates from Minchanabad lawyer