Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

MUHAMMAD TAYYAB versus MUHAMMAD SHARIF MALIK


Failure to examine the witness on the successive dates of the plaintiff, Article 3, Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the Civil Procedure Code Order XVII, R 3 Constitution Pakistan (1973), on which the trial court adjourned the trial to trial. ????? , The order was affirmed by the High Court in discontinuing its right to investigate the plaintiffs' testimony on such failure, and the High Court held that it was correct in holding the cross-examining witnesses on the due dates, which the court said Had to be abused. Thus, the properly maintained order of the trial court under which the right of the plaintiff to pass the test was discontinued, leave of appeal was denied in the circumstances

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
top advocate from Ugoki lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.