Lahore High Court Lahore — Judgments of 1985
1,439 reported judgments of the Lahore High Court Lahore from 1985 — page 10 of 15.
- NASIR ALI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1608
Under Section 100 100 Pakistan, the Pakistan Penal Code section 430read was read, the person's personal defense, the right to the prosecution case was absolutely denied and the accused was convicted o…
- ABDUL MAJID v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1610
The Pakistan Penal Code section 494 dismisses interference in the decision to acquit respondents with performance of respondents, despite the fact that the plaintiffs' second marriage agreement with t…
- PROVINCE OF PUNJAB v. SHAFIQUE AHMAD 1985 MLD 1616
Code of Conduct 1908, Section 151 and O XLI, rr 17 and 19 when the appeal was dismissed was far from satisfactory to the Applicant applicant for clarification not to be submitted by the counsel of the…
- KHALID MAHMOOD v. SALA HUDDIN 1985 PCRLJ 1617
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Code (XLV of 1860), Section 326 bail, 27 hours delay in the cancellation of the case reported to the police station just four points awa…
- GHULAM FARID v. SULTAN 1985 MLD 1619
Appeals to Civil Code 1908 Section 151 and O, XLI, rr 11 (2) and 19 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Section 5 and Article 168 are excluded, as are the delays available through the application for reinsta…
- MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1622
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (5) not only designated the charge of cancellation of the FIR within 20 minutes of the occurrence but also assigned the specific role of the firing to the p…
- INAYAT BANG v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER 1985 MLD 1622
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 154 Temporary Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Article 9 Constitutional application requiring registration of a case The applicant is instructed to refer to the …
- ALI MUHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 1985 MLD 1622
Civil Procedure Code Order XVI Meeting XVI and Attendance of Witnesses O XVI, r 7 A&O XVII, r 3 Failure to Produce Evidence by a Trial Court Responding to Impact of Service of Summons on Witness Proof…
- WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY v. RAHWALI SUGAR MILLS, RAHWALI, GUJRANWALA 1985 MLD 1624
Sections 12 (2), 114, 115, 151, AIX, r 13 and 0 XLVII, RR 1 & 2 of the Code of Civil Code 1908, the former party decree challenging the application, led by the law on fraud and misrepresentation. The …
- Messrs I SONS CORPORATION v. MUHAMMAD SARFRAZ CHEEMA, ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, LAHORE 1985 MLD 1627
Section 13 (3) (a) (i) t 15 On the record reading and appreciation of the jurisdiction of the appellate court, it was advanced by the plaintiff's lawyer that the removal order granted by the rental co…
- MUHAMMAD IQBAL v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1628
Article 2 30 30 and Part 304, Part and sudden accusation to admit differently from the prosecution There is no evidence other than the accused's statement, such statement which would not be impossible…
- MUHAMMAD ASLAM v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1633
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 616161 A Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), bail in section 6 proceedings6, was granted to the accused in 1969 on the basis of which the medical evidence supported the…
- GHULAM HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1635
The value of medical evidence of Sections 302/34 and 324/34, therefore, cannot be convicted of deliberate murder under Section 302/34; went…
- NISAR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1651
Definition of Evidence Section 302/34, Exception,, Penalty of the accused included under PPC was changed from Section 222 to Section 304, PPC and the death sentence imprisoned. Done.…
- SARDAR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1659
Section 302/325/149 Definition of evidence No crime was charged with emptying firearms No findings of such crimes were recovered Firearms Firearms Science Laboratory Hutchsheets and Sutas were not rec…
- MAULA BUX v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1665
Section 302/34 Purpose of Defining Evidence The motive established the ocular account presented by the witnesses, whose purpose was immediately listed in the first information report and the names of …
- MUHAMMAD LATIF v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1675
Pakistan Penal Code Section 325/34 Understanding of a crime with one or more accused is lawful [compromised]…
- ASAD KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1676
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC), section 497 of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), the application for Section 302 bail has been charged under the age of 16 when under section 497 (1). Criminal prose…
- MUNSHI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1677
Sections 342 and 364 of the Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC) failed to issue the required certificates under Section 364, CRPC, so that the defendant's statement was recorded in his presence and hearing…
- MANSHA v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1678
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 1414 ???? West Pakistan Control of the Gondas Ordinance (VX9 of XXXXX), Section 4 (()) on the direction of the Summary Military Court, the District Magistrate v…
- M. LATIF QURESHI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1680
Punjab Mandatory Articles (Control) Act 1973 Section 3/6 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Sections 435 and 561 charged with the sale of cement in the black market, summoned to the accused, the state to suspen…
- FATEH KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1683
Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Prevention of Corruption Act (III of 1947), Section 5 (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 342 Illegal Torture Legal Section 4 The legal weakness in recordin…
- GHULAM SHABBIR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1684
Section 2020 / / 3034 7 307 / Eye Eye Witnesses primarily present to the unbeliever with a motive other than the truth of the weapon; The presence of blood seems suspicious, Reliance not offered to pr…
- LAL KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1689
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 149, 302, 307, 148 a 323 Joint Object A dispute over the drainage issue between the parties and the matter erupted over the dispute over the residence of a prosecution wit…
- MUHAMMAD SAQLAIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1698
Articles 2/2/34 & and First 307 / First 34 The first information report includes the names of the accused, the weapons they carry, the individual parts paid by the accused and the names of the witness…
- SHER ZAMAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1705
Sections 302/149 and 307/149 eyewitnesses, formerly known as the accused, continue to look at the incident and identify the suspect, constantly saying that when the suspect armed with knives is deadly…
- NAWAZISH ALI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1712
Sections 302/34 and 307/34 of the Evidence Act (of 1872), Section 27 homicide was not recovered from the spot gun and revolver allegedly used in the commission of the crime, it was reported by the Fra…
- IRSHAD AHMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1719
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Supporting the retrieval of a witness without a license and the re-examination of the Chief and Cross-examination case in their examination…
- SYED SULTAN ALI SHAH v. GHULAM MUHAMMAD 1985 PCRLJ 1720
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 438 of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), section 420/34, under section 420/34, under the cancellation of an order seeking the defendant / applicant seeking a dis…
- SABAN v. MUSHTAQ AHMAD 1985 PCRLJ 1721
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 491 and 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 374, 380 and 411 detained police records show that three other cases under sections 379, 380 and…
- MUHAMMAD IDRIS v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1722
The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 has no inherent weakness in the statements of unlicensed gun prosecutors, whose witnesses have no serious hostility to the accused, face successful scr…
- DILAWAR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1723
Pakistan Penal Code Section 148/149/325 accused, sentenced to six months imprisonment, 1 month imprisonment and released on bail almost sixteen years ago. Sent back to prison for service. The convicti…
- JAVED IQBAL v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1724
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 514 Contempt Rule (XLV of 1860), Notice on Bail 302/404/148/149 Bail Notice On bail, the trial court for the accused is set before the appellant. Failed to be b…
- GHULAB v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1726
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 6 Ev6 evidence citing abduction test chief says that one of the accused committed rape with him while he stated during the examination that all the accused were committ…
- ARSHAD ALIAS ASHRAF v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1728
Sections 2/2/34, 5 325 and 4 324 Natural Witness Express Hate Against the accused…
- SARDUL v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1732
Sections 2302 and 4 304, good grave and sudden provocation, he was accused of finding his wife to deal with the deceased at night, and on the sudden and severe provocation he put the deceased on the l…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1735
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) ratifying the illegal pleas, magistrates and inspectors are not listening to any conversation between the accused an…
- THE STATE v. BAHARA 1985 PCRLJ 1736
Pakistan Penal Code Sections 325/34, 148 and 149 police chalked out three of the eight accused and summoned five other innocent trial magistrates who were not cleared by the police and after recording…
- MST. KANEEZ BEGUM v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1738
The Pakistan Penal Code Sections 468/109 and 471 have not been challenged because of the conviction that the parties had been compromised after the punishment, on which the parties had inherited accor…
- ATTA MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1739
Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Bribery [Trap Case] Complainant states that the accused had demanded not only the defamatory currency notes but also ill…
- UMAR HAYAT v. MUHAMMAD ASHRAF 1985 PCRLJ 1741
Section 302/34 verification, the requirements of the prosecution witnesses are either related to or interested in assisting the defendant in such case…
- MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1743
Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) The bribe [trap case] The recovery of the defaulted currency notes filed by the accused was explained immediately after …
- SHAMAS DIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1744
Sections 145 and 438 of the Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) refer to the High Court Magistrate's Passing Order without affecting any material that either of the two parties had in actual physical poss…
- NAZAR MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1746
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 498 Contempt Rules (XLV of 1860), Sections 325 and 148/149 Guarantees Before Grant, Grant of Applicants Appointed to Investigate During Temporary Bail Period I…
- MUHAMMAD WAHID v. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CITY LAHORE 1985 PCRLJ 1747
Interim Constitution Order 1981 Article 9 Criminal Case Enrollment accused of snatching 2 thousand from applicants, not mentioned in the original complaint while murder by police officers is still pen…
- MAQBOOL AHMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1748
Pakistan Penal Code Section 409 conviction, reduction of accused faced a long trial and 5 years after its appeal is coming up, the trial court fined Rs 40,000, [sentence].…
- GHULAM SARWAR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1749
The West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 defines a prohibited size knife from the possession of the defendants without any hostility against the witnesses, the accused and the witnesses of the…
- MUHAMMAD KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1750
Pakistan Penal Code Section 392 Evidence of Robbery, Defendant of the Eyewitness's Virtual Licensed Gun with a Gun, Freedom and No Hostility Defined, in Things [Recovered]…
- KAFAIT HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1764
The Pakistan Penal Code Section 468 & 420 Fraudulent Cheating School Certificate is not a genuine document. There were fake and fake entries in it. At the same time, along with filing his fake certifi…
- MUHAMMAD ADREES v. MUHAMMAD ZAHID YAMEEN 1985 PCRLJ 1770
Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 497 (5) of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 304 Bail, the cancellation of this termination, the bail is requested on the basis that the trial has commenc…
- JAHANA v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1773
Sections 302/149 and 148 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 382 B was sentenced to life imprisonment on the charge of 1969 when the sentence provided in 5302 was Tahiti and not life imprisonment. The se…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1779
S-302 Evidence Act (of 1872), Section 27 recovered pistol not sent to forensic science laboratory, recovered pistol, recovered pistol, no result. [Recovery]…
- FAZIL v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1790
Articles 302/34 and 307 define the testimony of murder. The first information report was immediately recorded and given the names of the suspects, the names of the witnesses, the immediate cause of th…
- MUHAMMAD NAWAZ v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1796
Sections 2234/30, 7 307/34 & 7 447/34 Par are disposed of illegally on behalf of each other and the purpose of civil and criminal litigation between them is not fully established. Witnesses are not av…
- MUHAMMAD AFZAL ALIAS AJOO v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1803
Pakistan Panel Code Sections 302/34 First Information Report a genuine document, which has been charged very urgently. All the details about the witnesses' names, the names of the accused, the weapons…
- GHULAM NABI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1818
Pakistan Penal Code Section 161 Anti-Corruption Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) Amending Pakistan Criminal Law (West Pakistan) Rules, 1962, r 2 Amending Rules By Approving Authorization Of Legislation…
- ASGHAR ALI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1823
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Sections 497 Contempt Rules (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 307 and 324/34 guarantees, at the time of the incident an empty hand grant co-accused who after the initial dis…
- IDREES KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1824
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Guaranteed 115 grams heroin petition convicted under Article 3 for 6 months imprisonment for judic…
- JAHANA v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1829
Articles 2/2/34 & Recovery7 / 34 Rec Recovery Prosecution During the trial, there is no known evidence that the vacancies and guns were retained at the police station and that they were forwarded to t…
- AMIR SULTAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1834
Sections 302, 300, exceptions 4, 148 and 149 apply to sections 148 and 149 of the accused under section 300 to exception 300, with the conviction of the PPC accused as well as the section 148, PPC in …
- RIAZ-UD-DIN JAUHAR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1849
Statement of Crimes (Special Courts) Ordinance 1984 Section 2 (d) Sanctions Regulation (XLV of 1860), Sections 380 and 420 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 Schedule Crimes Section 2 (…
- AKBAR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1878
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/148/149/120 B / 109 Bail Police Police prove that there was sufficient evidence to prove that the accused was pres…
- ZAHOOR AHMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1879
Section 2 302 // &&, 2 Eye, Exception 2 The witnesses 'case is closely related to the prosecution's witnesses' relatives and the defendant, and yet they did not come forward to support the prosecution…
- JAVID v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1901
Section 302/34 Definition of Evidence The first information report was filed immediately, a genuine document that includes the names of witnesses and suspects, the weapons used by them and the manner …
- MUHAMMAD ALIAS MAMMAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1907
Section 302 and 323 of the Evidence Act (of 1872), section 27, the trial court is not defining such manuscripts in accordance with the guidelines laid down by the High Courts. The time and event, the …
- RAZIA BIBI v. MUHAMMAD LQBAL 1985 CLC 1913
Appeal for suit for dissolution of marriage by the wife in court in the transfer of the West Pakistan Family Court Act 1964 Section 25 Family Suit, while the husband is pending in court along with the…
- FAZAL AHMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE 1985 CLC 1915
Interim Constitution Order 1981 Article 9 Maxim: Decision of the Auditorium of Appeal Lower Appellate Court Lower Appellate Court Deciding Appeal When the arguments are only heard on the request for a…
- SHAFQAT ALI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1917
No witnesses available for Section 2/201 / / / / availableurre Final evidence of trial, last-minute evidence, additional judicial confession and the possibility of recovery may be possible given that …
- KALSOOM v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 1985 CLC 1917
Section 25 of the West Pakistan Family Court Act, 1964, transfers a family lawsuit to the restoration of marital rights and the dissolution of marriage in the S&L, respectively, suing both the suit an…
- NAUSHER v. MEMBER,. BOARD OF REVENUE 1985 CLC 1918
Articles 10 (4) of the Government Land (Colony) Act 1912 and 19 of the Provisional Constitution Order (1 of 1981), increase the lease of Article 9 land. Claim that they were granted land under the Gor…
- MEHR KHAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1920
Pakistan Penal Code Section 4304, Part I Trial Court, concluding that the accused has exceeded his right to defend the person who appreciated the evidence in accordance with the guidelines laid down b…
- GHULAM MUSTAFA v. LAHORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY 1985 CLC 1922
Lahore Development Authority Act 1975 Section 6 Interim Constitution Order (1 of 1981), Article 9 Martial Law Instruction [MLA Zone A] s No. 23 Plots canceled by private negotiation with sale of dispu…
- BAKHSHA v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1924
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 498 Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/325/148/149 Guarantees Of the seventeen accused included in the Information Report for the first time, ten police f…
- MUHAMMAD SHAFI MALI K v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1925
Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Section 497/498 Conventional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 307/34 guarantees that the injured were not seriously injured in the head area, carrying most of the substance…
- NOOR HUSSAIN v. GHULAM 1985 CLC 1925
Civil Code 1908 Section 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), judgment against the decree passed under section 9 for review of section 9 restitution, special relief act, 1877 to entertain or decide the …
- CAPTAIN A.A. AZIZ v. DR. M.A.A. AZIZ 1985 PCRLJ 1926
The Criminal Procedure Code (CCPC), pending trial under Section 145, CCPC, has continued the proceedings on the basis of filing a civil suit through a petition filed in a civil court for a permanent i…
- IJAZ HUSSAIN v. MUNIR AHMAD 1985 CLC 1926
Punjab Pre-Emergence Act 1913 Section 4 Pre-Impression Sue Appeal Pre-Ammeter, who claims that (i) is a co-owner of the house and (11) the property is already divided at the time of the sale and an in…
- LIAQUAT ALI v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1928
Pakistan Penal Code Section 307/34 The suspect had the advantage of leaving the blank on the spot and only Lalkar attributed the cause.…
- MUHAMMAD SHARIF v. BOARD OF REVENUE (COLONIES BRANCH) 1985 CLC 1928
CPC Review O XLVII, r 1 and Civil Procedure Code Order XLVII of Section 151, both the State Counsel and the solicitor for the applicants agreed to the modification of the order under the review applic…
- SHUKAR DIN v. KHAN MUHAMMAD 1985 CLC 1929
Article 4 Constitution of Punjab Pre-Amendment Act 1913 Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Homeless persons (Land Settlement) Act (XLVII of 1958) vacates property before the sale of vacant property and cert…
- UNION COUNCIL NO. 16, TEHSIL KHUSHAB v. HABIB TEXTILE MILLS 1985 CLC 1930
Punjab Local Council (Taxation) Rules 1980 RR 5 (2), 6 and 7 Union Council proposes tax on import of goods, in appeal of Assistant Commissioner, the accuracy of Union Council records is doubtful. Be s…
- MUHAMMAD YASIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1931
Prohibited Order 1979 1979 Article 11 Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 103 Evidence Not Available Around and cited as evidence that the Chemical Examiner was delayed for 20 days, It was not…
- MUNAWAR v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1932
A dispute between the Pakistan Penal Code Section 304, Part I and the victim is allegedly taking place in the corn crush field where the prosecution [witnesses were] filling the corn in the bag. The a…
- FAZILAT BEGUM v. ABDUL AZIZ 1985 CLC 1933
Regarding the rental control order under section 13 (6), the West Pakistan Urban Rental Restriction Ordinance 1959 (6) disputes and directs the tenant to submit the rent at a cost of Rs 40 while the r…
- SHER MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1937
West Pakistan Arms Ordinance 1965 Section 13 Evidence Receiving Witness Lives 4 Acres From Restoration Place Other Prosecutor's Witness Although Available To The Public But Not Presented, Best Evidenc…
- DIN MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1946
Two accused and two Indian nationals arrested near the Indian-Pak border at 2pm on charges of the arrest of sections 156 (1) (8) and 178 of the Customs Act 1969, for the prosecution witnesses of the m…
- NAZIM v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1951
Articles 302/34 and 326/34 Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Section 154 Notice of the first notice prepared on the premises can be drawn that after the witness of the victim and the injured prosecu…
- MURID HUSSAIN v. RAZA ALI 1985 PCRLJ 1957
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Code (XLV of 1860), filed an FIR with a delay of three days by a person unrelated to the witness of the person named in Section 302 FIR …
- IQBAL HASAN v. MUHAMMAD ANWAR 1985 CLC 1957
Appeal X, r 19, Sections 151 and 115 of the CLC Rule Order Appeal for Re-entry / Reinstatement of Appeals Re-admission / Reinstatement of Appeal on the basis that the appeal has no merit Held on reque…
- HAJI MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1959
Criminal Procedure Code (CR PC) Section 497 Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Section 409/420/467 Applicant obtains the maximum amount of credit provided by the Financial Schedule in conjunction with the Ban…
- HAQ NAWAZ v. RIAZ 1985 PCRLJ 1960
Under Section 302/307/148/149 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (CCPC), the Complaint of Section 202, Penal Code (XLV of 1860), sent to the Sessions Judge by the Alka Magistrate Sessions Judge, withou…
- FAZAL HUSSAIN v. DIN MUHAMMAD 1985 CLC 1960
Sections 15 and 22. Zar Pancham, the plaintiff's deposit was identified due to a mistake due to the short collection of Zarath VI, and the plaintiff, who had indicated the termination of proceedings i…
- KHAIR DIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1962
The Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) requested the transfer of the section 526 case transfer case that the magistrate record a statement against the court's witness's promise unless a review of his ord…
- MUHAMMAD ASHRAF FALAHI v. E. AEVANS 1985 CLC 1963
Sections 21, 108a, 115 of the Evidence Act 1872, a statement made by a lawyer in one case, may be relevant to consider the adjudication pending in another case, pursuing the same case and the other ca…
- GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1964
Pakistan Penal Code Section 7?34 / appeal stage Compromise at the appeal phase had the effect of injuring the plaintiff for testimony, was compromised between the parties, a good case of reduction of …
- SHAMIM AKHLAQ v. WALAYAT KHAN 1985 CLC 1966
Succession Act 1925 Section 371 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 23 24 Certificate of Succession Jurisdiction The question of jurisdiction is necessarily connected with the residence of the dec…
- ARSHAD HUSSAIN v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1966
Pakistan Penal Code Section 304A Rickshaw and negligent suspect's bus collides with a deferred cycle and the death of his partner's partner is causing the carrier to fall down but the remaining two wi…
- FATEH MUHAMMAD v. THE STATE 1985 PCRLJ 1966
Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 307/34 guarantees an elderly man charged with larceny and thrown from a brick bat, without further investigation …
- SHER v. NAZAR MUHAMMAD 1985 CLC 1967
Punjab Pre-Emission Act 1913 Section 15 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 96, O VII, r 11, and XI, r 3 Pre-emption case reduction of court fees, trial court to pay former umpires through court f…
- NAIK MUHAMMAD v. ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE, VEHARI 1985 CLC 1969
The purpose and object of the section 3, 25, 26, 28 and 30 court fees of the Court Fees Act 1870 is to state that all fees collected by stamps are affected or adhesive or partially affected and Partia…
Other years — Lahore High Court Lahore
2015 · 2014 · 2013 · 2012 · 2011 · 2010 · 2009 · 2008 · 2007 · 2006 · 2005 · 2004 · 2003 · 2002 · 2001 · 2000 · 1999 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1990 · 1989 · 1988 · 1987 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1980 · 1979 · 1977 · 1976 · 1975 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971 · 1970 · 1969 · 1968 · 1967 · 1966 · 1965 · 1964 · 1963 · 1962 · 1961 · 1960 · 1959 · 1958 · 1957 · 1956 · 1955 · 1954 · 1953 · 1952 · 1951 · 1950 · 1949
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.