Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

IDREES KHAN versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CRPC) Section 497 Prohibition (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Arts 3 and 4 Guaranteed 115 grams heroin petition convicted under Article 3 for 6 months imprisonment for judicial detention Is more. More than 10 grams of heroin was recovered. This kind of crime against the entire society not only makes the addict's life miserable, but also causes his entire family to suffer permanent mental torture, which Bell denied. done.

1985 P Cr. L J 1824

[Lahore]

Before Gulbaz Khan, J

IDREES KHAN Petitioner

Versus

THE STATE Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3561/B of 1984, heard on 12th January, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.497‑‑Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order (4 of 1979), Arts.3 & 4‑‑Bail‑‑Recovery of 115 grams of heroine‑‑Petitioner in judicial lock‑up for 6 months‑‑Punishment for offence under Art.3 imprisonment for life if more than 10 grams heroine was recovered‑‑Such crime against entire society making not only life of addict miserable but also causing constant mental torture to his entire family‑‑Bail refused in circumstances.

M.A. Hameed Awan for Petitioner.

Rafi Siddiqui for the State.

ORDER

I have been taken through the F.I.R. of this case. According to the prosecution version, 115 grams of Heroine had been recovered from the petitioner near Star Hotel. The police had received secret information that the petitioner was dealing in the sale of Heroine.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner was not carrying Heroine in any suitcase but was alleged to have kept it in the pocket of his Shalwar end thus it was a case of further enquiry; that the petitioner is in the judicial lock‑up for the last about six months.

3. I have considered the contentions. Punishment for offence under Article 3 of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order, 1979, is) imprisonment for life if more than 10 grams heroine is recovered. In the present case, the petitioner was found to be in possession of 115 grams of heroine. It is a crime against the entire society. Not only the life of the addict becomes miserable but also the entire family remains under constant mental torture. The petitioner does not deserve the concession of bail. The petition is dismissed.

M.A.K.

Bail refused.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
famous high court advocate from Chak 4 b c lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.