Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MANSHA versus THE STATE


Criminal Code of Conduct (CCPC) Section 1414 ???? West Pakistan Control of the Gondas Ordinance (VX9 of XXXXX), Section 4 (()) on the direction of the Summary Military Court, the District Magistrate violated the terms of the bond. Blindly ordered to recover the bond amount, without restriction on section 16 (4), the West Pakistan Control of Gondas Ordinance 1959 and Section 514, on the request of the Code of Criminal Procedure, that the summary military court order was to be executed. , District Magistrate's Order, Held, Misdemeanor and Unlawful Order set aside and remanded for remand for necessary action by law. went

1985 P Cr. L J 1678

[Lahore]

Before Rustam S. Sidhwa, J

MANSHA and others‑‑Petitioners

versus

THE STATE‑‑Respondent

Criminal Revision No.921 of 1969, decided on 17th March, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑S.514‑‑West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance (XXXV of 1959), S. 16(4)‑‑Violation of terms of bail bond‑‑District Magistrate on direction of Summary Military Court blindly ordering recovery of amount of bond, without complying with provisions of S.16(4), West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959 and S. 514, Criminal Procedure Code, on plea that order of Summary Military Court was alone to be implemented‑‑Order of District Magistrate, held, misconceived and illegal‑‑Order set aside and case remanded to him for necessary action in accordance with law.

N. A. Shami for Petitioners.

Hamid Ali for the State.

ORDER

This is revision petition by Mansha and another petitioners, against the order of the District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, dated 1‑7‑1969, ordering the recovery of the amount of Rs.40,000 on surety bonds executed by the two petitioners in the amount of Rs.20,000 each for the good behaviour of one Noor Muhammad son of Haji Hussain, in pursuance of an order passed by the District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, dated 4‑11‑1968 under section 13/14 of the West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959.

2. I have heard the arguments of the learned counsel for the petitioners and the State and have also perused the record. It appears that the two petitioners had stood sureties for the good behaviour of Noor Muhammad, as stated above in respect of a case against that accused under section 13/14 of the West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959. During the subsistence of the said bond, the said accused Noor Muhammad was convicted under M.L.R. No.1l by a Summary Military Court, ‑Sheikhupura, in case F.1.R. No.57, dated 8‑4‑1968 lodged at Police Station Khanqah Dogran. He was sentenced to one year's regorous imprisonment in the said case. Pursuant to information being laid before the Summary Military Court that the accused Nisar Ahmad had violated the terms of the bond earlier given under the West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959, the Summary Military Court directed the District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, to have the amounts recovered from the present petitioners on the bonds furnished by them. The District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, instead of complying with the provisions of section 16(4) of the West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959, read with section 514 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, just blindly ordered the recovery of the amounts of the bond from the petitioners on the basis that the order of the Summary Military Court was alone to be implemented. This order is misconceived. The District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, could only have taken action under section 16 of the West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959, read with section 514 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in the said matter. In these circumstances, the impugned order of the District Magistrate, dated 1‑7‑1969 is illegal.

2‑A. For the foregoing reasons, this petition is accepted and the order of the District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, dated 1‑7‑1969, is set aside. The case is remanded to the District Magistrate, Sheikhupura, B for necessary action against the petitioners, as is available under section 16 of the West Pakistan Control of Goondas Ordinance, 1959, read with section 514 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

M. Y. H. Case remanded.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocates email from Lower Dir lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.