Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

SABAN versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD


Criminal Code of Conduct (CR PC) Sections 491 and 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 374, 380 and 411 detained police records show that three other cases under sections 379, 380 and 411 of the Ditto Code Ditto confesses that he was previously arrested and prosecuted without a license to maintain that the case was not appealed because They will be released on bail until settlement.

1985 P Cr. L J 1721

[Lahore]

Before Muhammad Sharif, J

SA B AN‑‑Petitioner

versus

MUSHTAQ AHMAD‑‑Respondent

Criminal Miscellaneous No. 38/H of 1985, decided on 12th March, 1985.

Criminal Procedure Code (V of 1898)‑‑

‑‑‑Ss. 491 & 497‑‑Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Ss.374, 380 & 411‑ Detention‑‑Police record showing that three other cases were pending against detenu under Ss. 379, 380 & 411, Penal Code and for retaining an unlicensed arm‑‑Contention of detenu that he was arrested earlier and case against him registered subsequently not appealing to reason‑ Detenu released on bail till disposal of case.

Muhammad Mumtaz Malik for Petitioner.

Malik Murid Abbas for Respondent.

Date of hearing: 12th March, 1985.

ORDER

The alleged detenu has been produced before me. Mushtaq Ahmad respondent No.1 is present in person as well as with his learned counsel Malik Murid Abbas. It has been stated by Mr. Ghazanfar Ali, Advocate, Kabirwala that his telephone set and a motor bicycle were stolen and the telephone set has been recovered from the alleged detenu. According to the police record, three other cases are pending against the detenu under sections 379, 380 and 411, P.P.C. and for retaining an unlicenced arm. The detenu has explained that he was arrested earlier and the A case against him was registered subsequently. This explanation does not appeal to the reason. The petitioner is released on bail in this case in the sum of Rs.5,000 with one surety in the like amount to the satisfaction of A. C./Duty Magistrate, Kabirwala till the disposal of the present case. The explanation furnished by Mushtaq Ahmad respondent No.1 may be filed and the notice given to him may be discharged.

M.Y.H. Order accordingly.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
list of advocates from Kohlu lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.