Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab — Judgments of 1984
480 reported judgments of the Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab from 1984 — page 1 of 5.
- WAPDA v. SHAFIQ-UR-REHMAN 1984 PLC 5
With the West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act 1958 Section 17 (TB) Service Tribunals (Act (LXXI of 1973), Section 2 (B) and Civil Servants Act (LXX of 1973), Section 2 (B)) and Indu…
- BADAR DIN v. THE WEST PAKISTAN SOCIETY FOR THE REHABILITATION OF DISABLED 1984 PLC 26
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxii) and 25A and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), section 2 (f) (i) read with the Payment o…
- WAPDA THROUGH CHIEF ENGINEER (E), GUJRANWALA v. MASOOD AHMAD 1984 PLC 39
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Provisions 25A & 38 (3) West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (of 1958), Section 17 (1B) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 WAPDA Empl…
- PLASTIC EMPLOYEES\' UNION (REGD.) v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS 1984 PLC 42
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 10 Registration of Trade Union, Order of Cancellation of Presiding Officer of Punjab Labor Court for cancellation of Appellant's Registration, which does no…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1984 PLC 45
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O12 (4) Sick leave on full salary, only sixteen-day medical leave on a half-pay to a regular employee of Lab…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. RIASAT ALI 1984 PLC 47
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 12 (5) Termination of Service Allegations of witnesses Al Inquiry into the allegation The Respondent recei…
- COLONY TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. ABDUL GHANI, 1984 PLC 48
Domestic Inquiry Cross Inspection As a representative of the administration, investigating complainant defense witnesses is not a fatal defect. The court order, under the circumstances, was set aside …
- GHULAM RASOOL v. HABIB BANK LTD. 1984 PLC 49
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 provides notice of complaint to the employer for an appeal and the same dismissal complaint that is not submitted within the prescribed time limit from t…
- MUHAMMAD BASHIR v. GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE 1984 PLC 53
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) Refusal of Service of Inquiry Notice Do not submit the notice of submission of inquiry notice to him…
- SALABAT KHAN v. GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE 1984 PLC 54
Despite repeated requests for Urdu translation of West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 inquiry report, the appellant was not given a copy of …
- LAKA KHAN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1984 PLC 56
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A (5) Depending on the Army Discharge Certificate in deciding the employee's complaint request under section 25A, the trial judge relies on a medical repo…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. ABDUL MAJID 1984 PLC 71
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Sections O, 12 (3) and Section O 15 (3) (6) charged with terminating services to provide employment protection again…
- ABDUL HAQUE, v. SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, WAPDA, GUJRANWALA 1984 PLC 75
Service Relationships dealing with the jurisdiction of Articles 25A & 38 of the West Pakistan Water and Power Development Authority Act (XXI of 1958), Section 17 (1B) Labor Court and Labor Appellate T…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. INDERYAS 1984 PLC 76
For the benefit of advance increment on passing the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) BA Examination, the Advance Advancement Scheme of Alliance in Pakistan Railways was later i…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. SAFDAR HUSSAIN 1984 PLC 77
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15, CL, (4) Charge Sheet Compensation Order for Trial Judge to Reinstate Employees Only, Incharge of Charge…
- NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD RASHID 1984 PLC 79
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 reads with section 25A Wage Commission Award, 1975, paragraphs 258 (4) and (5) of the charge against the Labor Court job, it filed its Wage Commission Award in …
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. MANZOOR AHMAD 1984 PLC 82
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) settlement of charge sheet delivery period was found not between PRTB and Union H Depot but between …
- HASSAN MUHAMMAD v. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1984 PLC 85
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Chicago's filing of a petition for representation represented by the appellant was answered on September 22, 1976, finally on August 16, 1978, the compla…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. IFTIKHAR AHMAD AND OTHERS 1984 PLC 86
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (5) Restricted appeals filed under unclean decisions made on August 31, 1979 after the expiry of the limitation period for preference of copies preferred…
- ABBASI TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. MAQBOOL AHMAD 1984 PLC 88
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 36 (2) read with Civil Procedure Code (V 1908), OXVI, rr 1 and 2 asking for a list of witnesses to the Presiding Officer of the Labor Court on a request to …
- WORKERS\' UNION v. HUSSAIN SUGAR MILLS 1984 PLC 129
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 40 Notice of Settlement Termination Applicability is applicable to both types of settlements, ie one that was agreed upon between the parties during the per…
- ABDUL GHAFOOR v. CHAIRMAN, PUNJAB LABOUR APPELLATE TRIBUNAL 1984 PLC 138
The Constitution of Pakistan read with the Article 199 Industrial Relations Ordinance of 1973 (XXIII of 1969), dismissed the employees after domestic inquiry under Sections 25A and 38 Section 25A, dis…
- PIONEER STEEL MILLS v. MUHAMMAD YAQOOB 1984 PLC 171
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint Notice Complaint begins due to lack of knowledge of the extent of the businessman's services to the martial law authorities, rather t…
- IMTIAZ HUSSAIN. v. ATTOCK REFINERY LTD 1984 PLC 173
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance was abolished after the 1968 section O-13 Retirement Services were overturned and no one was suspended.…
- ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, AGRICULTURE DEPARTMENT, PAKPATTAN v. BASHIR AHMAD 1984 PLC 193
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 15 (4) Corruption Domestic Inquiry Charge Sheet Workman allegedly misbehaved with his superior, who was al…
- WAPDA v. BASHIR AHMAD 1984 PLC 194
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) (c), Provisions and Section O15 WAPDA are neither functioning by or under the Government nor are the l…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ 1984 PLC 200
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 13 Return Word Category This means that in a establishment it is a whole business concern if one establishme…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. ABDUL HAKEEM 1984 PLC 202
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (i) and Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 2 (xxxviii) and a work assistant traffic m…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. SHAYA,N RAZA 1984 PLC 207
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 2 (xxviii) (a) and (b) Employee not only performs duties but also pays rent of house paid in cash as Terms of Service and Assistant Works. The Urban Urban …
- MUHAMMAD WAZIR v. HABIB BANK LTD . 1984 PLC 209
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 22A (8) (C) (G), 22A (12), 22B (1) (A), 38 (D), 38 (E) and 25A and West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance Ordinance (VII of 1968), Se…
- MUHAMMAD WAZIR v. HABIB BANK LTD . 1984 PLC 210
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Complaint Request Heirs of the slain laborer - Not entitled to maintain a complaint before the Labor Court…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. ZAHEER AHMAD 1984 PLC 218
No evidence of co-operation with mismanaged ambulatory co-operation The circumstances may have led to the Road Transport Board's checker being charged with having a connection with the conductor, who …
- 1984 PLC 220 1984 PLC 220
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, 37 months before the Labor Appellate Tribunal delimitation, was tiled 20 months after the date of the Labor Court's controversial decision that no question cou…
- DISTTICT MANAGER, PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. NANAH MASIH 1984 PLC 224
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 37 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968) read, Section O 15 (3) (e) absence without leave of mo…
- HAQ NAWAZ v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1984 PLC 346
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 12 (I) Termination of Permanent Employee Service Paying one month's notice or paying one month's salary in…
- PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD v. MUHAMMAD FAZIL HUSSAIN 1984 PLC 376
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 2 (i) and Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 2 (xxviii) of the Worker Overseer, Measure…
- HABIB BANK STAFF UNION (C.B.A.), LAHORE ZONE v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, LAHORE REGION 1984 PLC 418
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 10 (1) (i) and (ii) Registrar paid by members for failure to maintain forms seeking permission to cancel trade union registration for business organization…
- JAMEEL AHMAD v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD, MULTAN 1984 PLC 420
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) and 25 A words are employed Employees who are found in the definition of \ labor definition do not mean that they should be in service at the tim…
- MUHAMMAD SAEED KHADIM v. UNITED INDUSTRIES LTD., FAISALABAD 1984 PLC 422
A dismissed person is considered to be dismissed for misconduct. Absence of more than ten days is considered mismanagement but not so severe as to attract fines for future employment. Awarded and not …
- UNIVERSAL OIL & VEGETABLE GHEE MILLS LTD. v. JAFFAR KHAN 1984 PLC 424
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (4) has been charged with domestic inquiry and sentenced in a criminal case.…
- GHEE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. v. KHALID PASHA 1984 PLC 429
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 section 38 does not review the jurisdiction of the Labor Appellate Tribunal to approve or approve an order approved by a pretrial tribunal.…
- UTILITY STORES CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN LTD. v. ABDUL AZIZ 1984 PLC 434
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Request for Complaint Against Dismissal Domestic Inquiry Procedure Not Referred To Labor Court With Redirected Returns…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, MULTAN v. SHAHID HUSSAIN NAQVI 1984 PLC 436
Para 205 Daily Allowance Continued Hold for more than ten days without general or individual exemption not acceptable by authorized authority No approval of exemption No approval of DA claim for more …
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. v. NAZEER HUSSAIN ZAFAR 1984 PLC 437
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Application for complaint of dismissal of employment for mismanagement An order charge was refused to allow the bank employee's case to be dism…
- MUHAMMAD ISHAQ v. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TUBE?WELL OPERATION DIVISION, IRRIGATION (SOUTH), SHEIKHUPURA 1984 PLC 438
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 36 prohibited the application of practice and procedural complaints by default, or the Labor Court rejected the restoration application under the Labor …
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., SIALKOT v. MUHAMMAD SAEED 1984 PLC 439
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38E Bank Employees' Jurisdiction Under the Labor Court The provision of the Ordinance enforced on the Wage Commission Award under Section 38E Labor Co…
- CHIEF ENGINEER, HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT v. MUHAMMAD HASIL 1984 PLC 441
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section 1 (4) 2 (i) and Section O15 (3) of the Punjab Civil Servants Act (VIII of 1974), Section 2 (b) (iii) and Wor…
- POSTMASTER?GENERAL, CENTRAL CIRCLE, LAHORE v. TAI MUHAMMAD SIDDIQUI 1984 PLC 444
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Request for a Complaint Temporary Order Prohibited Applicants Worked on Retirement Notices on the basis of Retirement Age, Labor Court Appeals to Labor C…
- NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD MUSTAFA KAMAL KHAN 1984 PLC 445
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Request for Complaint against Dismissal for Absence of Duty Abuse is evidence that the absence was due to illness, which was confirmed by a med…
- G. T. S. ALFATAH LABOUR UNION (REGD.), FAISALABAD v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1984 PLC 446
Domestic Inquiry Bus Conductor Tickets Demand for less passenger labor Attendance of such passengers and in every case it is not possible to pass the place of inquiry to the residence of the Industria…
- MISRI KHAN v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD 1984 PLC 452
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Notice of Complaint Complaint Required to Employer Without Notice of Legal Complaint Delayed after four years An attempt was made to apologize for illnes…
- MUHAMMAD FAROOQ v. MESSRS DAWOOD HERCULES CHEMICALS LTD. 1984 PLC 453
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance 1968 Section O 15 (3) (h) Respect for revolt and the decoration of high officers should be maintained, the worker suffering from fever is 1…
- GOVERNMENT TRANSPORT SERVICE, GUJRAT v. MUHAMMAD ASLAM 1984 PLC 454
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Dismissal Inquiry Officer Disapproved For Passenger…
- NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN, LAHORE v. MUHAMMAD ISHAQ 1984 PLC 455
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 22A (8) and (9), 22B (3) (A), 25A, 38E and 38D Labor Court and National Industrial Relations Commission Jurisdiction only Only in criminal cases under sect…
- MUHAMMAD ZARAIT v. MUHAMMAD AMIN 1984 PLC 457
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 The jurisdiction of the Punjab Labor Appellate Tribunal Limited may be incorporated within the limits of the Punjab. The government does not extend to Is…
- ABDUL AZIZ KHAN LODHI v. PAKISTAN GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY 1984 PLC 465
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) does not require the manager or supervisor branch manager of the insurance company to be a clerk, a typist, development officer, approve thei…
- NAZIR AHMAD v. GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB 1984 PLC 467
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Complaint Filing Applicant Demanding his Applicant Applicant to Work Regularly in a Phased Program Regularly to Establish Employee Compensating…
- MUHAMMAD AKRAM v. PUNJAB ROAD TRANSPORT BOARD, LAHORE 1984 PLC 468
Sections 25A (5) and 38 (3) of the complaint against dismissal for mismanagement were not presented to the court due to non-production of tickets on the Labor Court charge of obstructing the ticket on…
- MUHAMMAD ALI LUQMAN v. WAPDA 1984 PLC 476
Section 15 of the Salary Act 1936 does not appeal to the decision of the employees of the administration of the sentence suspended and the compensation for the period of employment is claimed before t…
- ANJUMAN?E?MASIHI MAZDOOR UNION, SIALKOT (REGD.) v. OCTROI EMPLOYEES\' UNION, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, SIALKOT 1984 PLC 479
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Sections 1 (3), 3, 8, 11 and 38 (3) Registration of the Trade Union Registrar Starts the Appeal Tribunal to the Labor Court Regression Start Order In the review bef…
- NAZIM HUSSAIN v. SHAHI BOTTLERS LTD., LAHORE 1984 PLC 480
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 13 Returns For the first time, the rule of regulation has been excluded because of a service challenging t…
- SURAJ GHEE INDUSTRIES LTD., SHEIKHUPURA v. ABDUL RAZZAQ 1984 PLC 487
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Appeal for dismissal complaint for misconduct by the Appellate Tribunal accused of absent leave without, in the circumstances, conducting new i…
- SUTLEJ COTTON MILLS, OKARA v. KHURSHID ALI 1984 PLC 489
Disclosure of corruption for more than ten days Setting up an inquiry report After receiving the inquiry report, the competent authority in charge was accused but proved guilty but management did not …
- AMANULLAH v. PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1984 PLC 491
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read with Sections 37 and 38 Civil Procedure Code (V of 1908), A XLI, r 27 Additional evidence allowed at the appeal stage is necessary for the correct decision…
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., SIALKOT v. GHULAM RASOOL GHUMAN 1984 PLC 506
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Production of Appeal of Extra Evidence Appellate Tribunal of Additional Evidence to decide whether or not additional evidence has been tried and is requi…
- MESSRS NATIONAL CONSTRUTCION LTD., FAISALABAD v. ABDUL RAHMAN 1984 PLC 508
Dismissal for domestic misconduct An inquiry officer for two charges presented evidence on record of both charges, indicating that only one indictment proves that the probation officer was not likely …
- UNITED BANK LAHORE v. ALAM ZEB 1984 PLC 511
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxviii) (b) Workman's Supervisory Duties Bank Employee Key Operation A Supervisory Job No Supervisory Duties to Exempt Employees From Yellow means Superv…
- MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, GUJRANWALA v. MUHAMMAD SHAFI 1984 PLC 514
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 37 Delay in Appeal Limit One day delay attempt to file deadline failed due to bus break failure in which the person authorized to file the appeal showed tra…
- SAIDULAMTU & BROS., CONTRACTORS DAWOOD HERCULES v. MUHAMMAD HANIF 1984 PLC 515
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 2 (xxiv) and 25 A contract that is applied by request for complaints The previous contractor's contract between the new contractor and the Department of Lab…
- MUSHVILLE INDUSTRIES, LAHORE v. KHAN MUHAMMAD 1984 PLC 518
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 36 Procedure and Procedure Adjustment cannot be properly sought for the dismissal of the Labor Court because in the case of a lawyer's absence, if a valid r…
- MUHAMMAD TARIQ BUTT v. GLAXO LABORATORIES (PAKISTAN) LTD 1984 PLC 519
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance read with the 1968 Section O15 (3) Factories Act (XXV of 1934), Section 46A may take overtime work against overpaid /…
- MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD., FAISALABAD v. MOHYUDDIN MAHMOOD JOYA 1984 PLC 521
The West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 section 2 (i) and the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), section 2 (xxviii) (a) and (b) define the …
- ABDUL RAUF KHAN v. S. A. REHMAN & SONS 1984 PLC 524
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Reads with West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VI of 1968); Section 1 (4) Appeals to Labor Court Complaint Re…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. VI UHAMMAD ZAHID 1984 PLC 525
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 15 (3) (f) Disadvantageous Habitat Late attendance is spread over a few months to indicate that the late a…
- SARGODHA TEXTILE MILLS LTD, v. ABDUL HALEEM 1984 PLC 526
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 Appellate Tribunal Powers No Review Jurisdiction Limits Correction of Molvi and Typing Errors…
- IRRIGATION OPERATION LABOUR UNION (C.B. A.), SARGODHA DIVISION, SCARP 11 v. REGISTRAR, TRADE UNIONS, PUNJAB 1984 PLC 527
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 was read with Section 35 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), under section 20 Regional Jurisdiction Labor Courts Guidance, the Civil Procedure Code 1908 shall be de…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. MUHAMMAD RIAZ AHMAD 1984 PLC 528
Dismissal charges for mismanagement: (1) Passenger without tickets, allegedly recovering, and (2) Passenger who is deprived of ticket, who is also charged with fare, second charge is not related to mi…
- KARMAN MASIH v. MAYOR, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, FAISALABAD 1984 PLC 529
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O 10 B Group Insurance Claims Payment Payment Act, 1936 for the jurisdiction of the Authority only in cases …
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT (WORKSHOPS), PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. KHAWAJ MUHAMMAD 1984 PLC 537
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 Review Tribunal cannot review a speculation order regardless of whether it was justified or not…
- WORKS MANAGER, LOCO SHOP, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS v. AKHTAR HUSSAIN 1984 PLC 540
Factories Act 1934 Section 47 Overtime Wage Measurement The standard for its calculation is to be between the sentence or the sentence in relation to the job and to disregard and read the work done in…
- NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD HALEEM CHOHAN 1984 PLC 557
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 reads with the section 38C&38Device Commission Awards The Wage Commission decisions published under I and III section 38C are considered to be just one award, s…
- ABDUS SALAM KHAN v. PAKISTAN RAILWAYS 1984 PLC 572
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A (1) Notice of Complaint by Advocate Waleed A. Aziz vs. Pakistan Paper Corporation, Karachi Another PLD 1979 attacked 490. Abdul Ghafoor v Sindh Labor Co…
- PIONEER STEEL MILLS LTD. v. ALLAH RAKHA 1984 PLC(CS) 586
The fact sheet for domestic inquiry and the officer's ability to appoint an inquiry officer could not be pressed for the first time in the arguments before the Labor Court. Such eligibility was neithe…
- FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN v. QAMAR ABBAS 1984 PLC(CS) 592
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 1 (3) (a), 25A & 38 (3) Ordinance of ME Section Employees (Respondents) Applicable to the Services or to the Armed Forces Affiliate or Installation of Emplo…
- MUHAMMAD SULEMAN MALIK v. LEVER BROTHERS (PAKISTAN) LTD 1984 PLC(CS) 594
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) is not a legal right of the parties to review. Only one can inform the Tribunal that the Labor Court has passed a false or illegal order, such i…
- MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION 1984 PLC(CS) 595
The statement of the domestic inquiry is not recorded, there is no indication that the accused was asked to make his statement mandatory dismissal. , Section 25A & 38 (3)…
- MUHAMMAD SULTAN v. KCHINOOR OIL MILLS LTD. 1984 PLC(CS) 596
No allotment order was made in the possession of the residential quarterly employees quarters, nor was the Labor Court's decision to request a challenge complaint for an outlet to an employee removed …
- TEJU MASIH v. CHAIRMAN, TOWN COMMITTEE, SAMMUNDRI 1984 PLC(CS) 599
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) Former Order of the Reviewing Authority under the Payment of Wages Act, 1936 states that the Act was not enforceable nor was such objection raised i…
- GHANI MASIH v. CHAIRMAN, TOWN COMMITTEE, SAMMUNDRI 1984 PLC(CS) 600
On the Special Establishment (a Town Committee) under the notification regarding Sections 2, 15 and 17 of the Wage Payment Act 1936 and the Industrial Relations Ordinance (XXIII of 1969), Section 38 (…
- NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. MUHAMMAD SAEED AKHTAR 1984 PLC(CS) 601
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) Read with First Wage Commission Award, paragraph 258 (4) and (5) termination of employment of bank employees for corruption Any of the alleged …
- 1984 PLC(CS) 602 1984 PLC(CS) 602
West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance 1968 Section O15 (3) (e) Leave Request for Vacation Medical Certificate No information on rejecting the suspect's medical…
- DIVISIONAL SUPERINTENDENT, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS, RAWALPINDI v. MUHAMMAD AMEER 1984 PLC(CS) 603
Pakistan Railway Personnel Manual R4 (9) (ii) Read with subsidiary r1 Prevention of increment term WIP does not mean that there is no inconsistency with the Permanent Increase Prevention Rule for a sp…
- PUNJAB URBAN TRANSPORT CORPORATION v. MUSHTAQ AHMAD 1984 PLC(CS) 605
In the case of dismissal ick case for mismanaged bus conductors, the statement of passenger passenger fares has not been inspected by the party checker and there is no evidence of receipt of compensat…
- CRESCENT FACTORIES VEGETABLE 6HEE MILLS v. MUHAMMAD SIDDIQ 1984 PLC(CS) 606
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 38 (3A) cannot be challenged in the revision ad interim steel order until the next date issued by the Labor Court, thereby requesting it to the Labor Co…
- PACKAGES LTD. v. SARDAR MASIH 1984 PLC(CS) 607
Domestic Inquiry Charge Sheet and Inquiry Notice Cannot Be Asserted by Registered Post but Its Receipt Under Postal Certificate; Inquiry, Under the circumstances, Order of Dismissal and Final Dismissa…
- NASEEM AHMAD v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 1984 PLC(CS) 608
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 36 Civil Procedure Code (V8 1908), read with O XVI, r The examination of the 14 witnesses may not be examined as a court testimony by a party wishing to…
- REHMAT GUL v. DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, I. C. I. PAKISTAN MANUFACTURER LTD., SHADHARA 1984 PLC(CS) 609
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A & 38 (3) The request for restitution of the complaint application was confirmed by a statement which was heard with misunderstanding. , Setting aside th…
- DAWOOD HERCULES CHEMICALS LTD. v. MUHAMMAD ARIF. 1984 PLC(CS) 610
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 Respondents' written statement No need for the law to object that the written statement was signed by the Advocate and not by the plaintiff…
- MUNAWAR MEHMOOD v. PUNJAB AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPLIES CORPORATION 1984 PLC(CS) 618
Applicants 25, 36 and 38 (3) of the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 decision to apply for a complaint have no right to the applicant at this stage to prepare further evidence by the defendant in a…
- MECHANISED CONSTRUCTION OF PAKISTAN LTD. v. MUHAMMAD ISMAIL 1984 PLC(CS) 619
The Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 read with Section 37 Civil Code of Conduct (V 1908), O XLI, r 19 Appeals rejected in default, in which case, the respondents are subject to payment of Rs. 100 a…
Other years — Labour Appellate Tribunal Punjab
2000 · 1998 · 1997 · 1996 · 1995 · 1994 · 1993 · 1992 · 1991 · 1988 · 1986 · 1985 · 1984 · 1983 · 1982 · 1981 · 1979 · 1976 · 1974 · 1973 · 1972 · 1971
Case law is provided for information only and is not legal advice. Need help with a matter like these? Find a verified lawyer in your city.