Lawyers Directory Listing
Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.
Petition No. SG‑49 of 1982, decided on 16th May, 1982.
‑‑S. 38‑Powers of appellate Tribunal‑No review jurisdiction Correction of clerical and typing mistakes‑Not restricted.
Syed Fazal Hussain Shah Hamdani for Petitioner.
Respondent in person.
Date of hearing : 15th May, 1982.
This review petition is for correction of the judgment of this Court, dated 31st January, 1982, whereby it was observed that the direction of payment of back benefits made by the. learned lower Court was justified. In reality, the learned Lower Court had reinstated the respon dent without back benefits but due to oversight or typing mistake in the first paragraph of judgment it was mentioned that the respondent was reinstated by the learned Lower Court with back benefits. On account of this error made in the first paragraph of the judgment, in the end it was observed that deduction of the payment of back benefits was justified.
2. There is no provision of review in the I. R. O. but there is no restric tion upon the correction of clerical and typing mistake. It is, therefore, ordered that in the first paragraph of the judgment of this Court, dated 31st January, 1982 the words with back benefits' be corrected to without back benefits' and consequently the last but one sentence of the judgment will read "since intentionally such an officer was appointed as the Enquiry Officer the direction of payment of back benefits also appears to be justified' be deleted.
A. E.
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer