Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAZAQ versus MUHAMMAD ABDUL QAIYYUM

Articles 25 (2) and 44 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Constitutional petition for a prohibited motion of respondents who was elected to the post of Prime Minister and President after the Assembly of the Member Assembly / allegations of restoration of the Constitution And arguments against the respondents, even if they are found from a substance, will require inquiry and evidence, and if its truth is found, it will result in the disqualification of the defendant where a member of the Assembly Individuals had choice after choice. Applicants are disqualified as accused, such question was decided by the Chief Election Commissioner on a reference given by the Speaker of the Assembly jurisdiction of the High Court under section 44, Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act of 1974. , Which has to be subject to other clauses. The Constitution, the Court could not enter into the duties that the applicants sought to do in view of section 25 (2) of the Constitution wherein it had jurisdiction. family advocate from Patoki lawyer