AMBREEN GUL versus NOMINATION BOARD OF AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Nomination for admission in MBA, Article 44 Constitutional Directive Act (VIII of 1974), B section course in various medical colleges of Pakistan against reserved seats, reserved for M District resident on such seats. had gone. The applicants challenged on the ground that the defendant had abandoned his ancestral home and adopted a domicile of his choice not to have the right to be nominated for a seat reserved for the original district M. Domicile of Domicile and the discriminatory effect of the election and The results are flowing. After the adoption of the choice domicile, the original domicile disappears during this period and is resurrected upon abandoning the choice (the respondent who, after abandoning the preferred domicile, is actually the domicile of M). Confessed to, applied for a fresh domicile from M. which was issued in favor of this will not apply for a period of 5 years. Only after it happened, the respondents' choice was born again after leaving their home country, the original seat for the MB, B section course. The election of his seat was nominated from the district for TT
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
