Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN versus MUNIZA BI

Azad Jammu and Kashmir Rights to Advance Purchase Act 1993 Section 14 [as amended by the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Right of Preferred Purchase (Amendment) Act, 1993] Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974), section 42 The General Clause Act (X of 1897), S: 6 was amended by section 14 to pre-empt defendant (being the vendor's sister), from the rights of Azad Jammu and Kashmir. The first purchase law was enforced and when a sister was attacked, she was entitled to a lawsuit. During the trial of the plaintiff for the pre-detention trial, Article 14, Azad Jammu and Kashmir was amended in advance and the pre-existing rights of rights based on the Islamic Association were added. Under which the plaintiff lost his former right. Consequently, the trial court dismissed the plaintiff's case for premature detention. The dismissal of the case was affirmed in the appeal The High Court upheld the amendment to the pre-purchase Act of section 14, Azad Jammu and Kashmir before the decision of the High Court, pending the adjournment in the courts will not affect the cases. Turned down the results of the courts. s where the legitimate right does not appear in the relevant law, the suits which were pending at the time of amending section 14 of the Act shall be governed by the amended provisions which were in force at the time of the institution suit and not the amending law. The terms and conditions of the plaintiff's trial court were confirmed in the terms of immigration advocates email from Mangi lawyer