Sections 9, 48 and 74 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (V9 1898), Section 516 drug paraphernalia restoration vehicle, delivery of the underprivileged vehicle and its driver seized, since the narcotics have been recovered. , The applicant has claimed that he is the real owner. Although it is permissible to search the interior and interim possession of the vehicle, the provisions of section 74 of the Narcotic Material Stances Act 1997 do not impose an absolute restriction on the issuance of the vehicle, but the claimant must at least prove to the initial person Had to say that he had nothing. Any type of nexus or committal that was with the Commission or the driver of the applicant charged with the offender, who initially formed the applicant's alliance with the accused, suggested the accused's innocence as Without the recording of evidence of what was not known. In the controlled question of Narcotic Substance AC, he committed the crime or was convicted of a vehicle, T, 1997, which generally had the power to impose criminal law and resolve the complaint. Special procedure was provided for, generally prohibiting the rule of law contained in section 48 of the Control of Narcotic Substances Act 1997. The victim was able to file an appeal against a special court-approved order under his jurisdiction and review whether the drug was provided under Section 48 of the Anti-Drug Laws A review of the first fatigue treatment review appeal was excluded.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
