Section 302 (b) Qatil had a deep connection with the prosecution's witnesses and the injured complainant, with each other and with the victim, praising the evidence. After an initial investigation and consultation, an FIR was lodged, under which their identification value FIR was terminated, which was not registered at the police station. Suspicious eyewitnesses have made some dishonest corrections only to cover the error found in the prosecution case, and to match the prosecutor's story with other evidence collected during the investigation, such as Improvements, which are once found to be delusional and dishonest, cast serious doubts. The truth of the witnesses, the site's plan to invalidate their testimony had negated the prosecution's version of the testimony, the witnesses, who presented the ocular account, did not agree with each other on the material aspects of the case. The contradictions were the witnesses found in the interstate statements, the story presented by both of the prosecution's witnesses from the moment of the incident to their hospitalization and filing of the report, running contrary to each other, which is suspected in the prosecution. For a case to be fatal, the conviction should be based on impeccable evidence. And any doubts which arise in the case of the prosecution should be resolved in favor of the accused, without a doubt, the alternative of the innocent person, where the name of the accused was named in the murder case, is a non. It was a minor occurrence, however, depending on the case. In the present case, the incident did not take place in the manner and manner in which the account of the complainant's eye witness
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
