Section 172 and 53 Revenue Entries Accuracy Defendants' intention was that the District Officer Revenue did not have the authority to change the entries in the record of rights, as well as the decision that the plaintiff had a legal case in this suit. Were the owners of the property. The plaintiffs, named in the names of the plaintiffs standing from 1943 to 1994, preferred the request for correction of registration of rights records to the District Officer Revenue when the same District Officer Revenue had approved the order for correction of the registration. Available records were not provided, neither any area was extended in favor of the plaintiffs, nor was the title or privilege of the defendants interrupted, but the entries were made in respect of the area already existing and the wrong entry was filed before the Revenue Officer. Was added to the record. Whenever a wrong entry was viewed by him he was obliged to make amends. The venue officer had the authority to pass an order for correction of entry, article record or modification of entry in the rights record when the title question was included. There is no question of the title of section 53 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act, 1967. Was involved in the present case but it was merely a correction of registration, so the powers used by the Revenue Officer were supported by the law, the circumstances were revised.
Related judgments — Peshawar High Court NWFP, 2015
