Find a Lawyer

HUMAYUN BADSHAH versus HABIB BANK LTD.

Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25A Habib Bank Limited (Staff) Service Rules, 1981, R6 Utilities and Discipline (Bank and Financial Institutions) Rules, 1975, Section 4 to 6 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 High Court Constitutional jurisdiction Using the constitutional jurisdiction, the special appellate jurisdiction tribunal's decisions aside, the Labor Appellate Tribunal's orders could be rescinded if they came to the conclusion that these provisions were of legal jurisdiction. And where the court or tribunal had no legal effect. The jurisdiction and the specific question it set forth, it cannot be accused of any kind of illegal or material misconduct simply because the fact or even the labor tribunal related to the law was misdirected and The Discipline (Banks and Financial Institutions) Rules, 1975, were enforced and led to misunderstandings. The error found that the charge was issued by the Disqualifying Authority High Court, which was properly re-examined by the Labor Appellate Tribunal in respect of the facts filed by the Labor Appellate Tribunal. Came to the conclusion that the legal jurisdiction was declared by the labor tribunal to such an extent without legal authority. Indeed, the Labor Appellate Tribunal on the plane found it appropriate to return the terminus in order to properly take advantage of it while directing the rehabilitation of the employees, the decision of the High Court decision on returning employees back. Was set aside by the Supreme Court and the operative part of the Labor decision immigration advocate from Machh lawyer