Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD YASIN versus STATE

Approval of the proof of approval of Article 302 Criminal Code (v. 1898), Articles 337 and 338 of the Convention (Article 10 of 1984), Article 37 Constitution of Pakistan (1973); Article 185, almost three years after the incident. It was thought that the police had made a significant improvement in his statement before, or alleged that the accused saved his or her skin to save his skin. And he had no factual statement. Instead of confirming the statement of approval, medical evidence denied the same pistol, which he allegedly used in the incident, and recovered from the suspect's offer. The witnesses on the scene were not matched by the accused before the accused, who had allegedly surrendered extra-judicially, that they were not authorized persons, they had no sense of doing so by the accused and their statements had nothing to do with the prosecution. To no avail and on the record to prove the capital's charge against him Was not available. The accused has been accused of failing to gain, as a suspect, [approval]. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Gari Mori lawyer