FAZAL WAHID versus MUHAMMAD SADIQ KHAN
Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the plaintiff's denial of title to the plaintiff in which it is claimed that he is the tenant of another joint owner of the joint property, the plaintiff's lawsuit. The verdict was pronounced and such finding is upheld in the appeal. The High Court found the plaintiffs guilty in the review and rejected their review of the court's orders and judgment against them, which means that they are the tenants of another landlord and proceedings in favor of it. The person executes the document that is being processed. Defendant's attorney also affirmed the document (the hiring process) as the person who authenticated the testimony has authority and based on that the execution of the document cannot be a valid witness, especially At a time when he claimed to be executive. The third party was correct in holding the dispute as joint owner by the High Court, in whose favor the alleged rental application was the best witness to testify to its execution, and after appearing, the defendant's lawyer's evidence proved Was not sufficient to do so, no legal error was stated in the High Court verdict, the application for leave of appeal was dismissed
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous lower court advocate from Makli lawyer