Find a Lawyer

CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN TELECOMMUNICATION CORPORATION, ISLAMABAD versus ABDUL RASHID

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 212 Promotional Department Promotion Committee not recommending public servants for development of the conditional approval of the Public Service Commission Two temporary sanitary lists were issued by the government employees in which the government employee was mistaken. He was assigned to the cadre of officers in section 16 of the BP in the recommendation date of the Departmental Promotion Committee. Such an assumption is inaccurate. The authority authorized by the Public Service Commission did not reject , And their list of seniority lists under which they join the cadre Was demonstrated. BP Section 16, without a foundation department, was, therefore, eligible to withdraw lists that were based on such misconceived service tribunal's view that, if not represented, against temporary listings, this agreement The final form cannot be given, as government employees do not take advantage of the error or at the very face of the record it may appear that no argument can be requested against the department under which the correct employee list is prepared according to the official employee. Therefore, no cadre can claim sanity from this date even when he is not a member of it. Had been On the contrary, the decision of the service tribunal under which it was ordered that the sanitary list was finalized, was set aside and the department upheld / upheld the orders to withdraw the seniority list. had gone. divorce advocates from Sanghar lawyer