Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SINDH EMPLOYEES\' SOCIAL SECURITY INSTITUTION versus ALLWIN ENGINEERING INDUSTRIES LIMITED


West Pakistan Employees Social Security Ordinance 1965 Section 20 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 Right to claim participation in favor of some employees of Social Security Institute High Court rejects constitutional petition against the Social Security Institute's right Was refused. On the initial point, some employees' contribution to the claim that the West Pakistan Employees / Social Security Ordinance, 1965, provides suitable machinery for finding solutions. Nevertheless, he expressed his opinion on the merits of the matter that the High Court should not have made any observation on the merit, which could be biased by any party after the dismissal of constitutional petitions at the preliminary point, on behalf of the High Court. The observation on merit should not be considered partial. The decision in question

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
criminal advocate from Chacklala lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.