Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHAR BAIG versus MUHAMMAD AZAM

Special Relief Act 1877 Section 12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) The plaintiffs have been instructed to submit a balanced amount of value within the stipulated time. Due to the failure of the petitioner to submit the balance amount, the plaintiff did not submit the amount due to the suspension of the plaintiff's attempt to withhold the order, so he withdrew his appeal. ? Therefore, the plaintiff's appeal was dismissed without notice to the plaintiff for depositing the amount of the plaintiff, whereby the plaintiff's appeal was found to be known when the plaintiff found the dismissal, when he could submit the balance amount. Are. The time the defendant deposited the balance amount within that time had the effect of suspending the order for payment of the balance amount by the plaintiff, in order to approve the resultant order necessary to deposit the balance amount The High Court's removal cannot be for the prejudicial rights of the plaintiffs, as was generally found by the High Court. Eventually the decision was made, the court became offset and could not grant an extension order, however, by the appellate court, the execution of the decree was halted but, when the appeal was dismissed, the balance was collected. An order to extend the time or give more time, which should have been made but was not made, will have the jurisdiction to rectify the error and provide the error and when such error / error has been identified the appeal The High Court's order to collect the balance amount after the expiry is absolutely lawful, fair and fair, no interference is guaranteed. Will jobs for advocates from Sadiqabad lawyer