Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

STATE versus IQBAL AHMED KHAN


Articles 27 (1) (a) and 27 (2) (b) of the Drugs Act 1976, Article 185 (3) apply to a prosecution of a prosecution by a federal drug inspector or a provincial drug inspector in law. Can be done And in this case the complainant did not hold either of these positions. The complainant was not competent to appear before the trial court / litigation, the entire proceeding failed and the decision taken by the High Court to acquit the accused was valid and in accordance with the law. Accordingly, the leave to appeal was denied

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
property advocates from Mangal Sada lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.