FAIZ KARIM versus MULTAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Punjab Development of Status Act 1976 Section 4 (4) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) was canceled after the cancellation of the original allotment for non-fulfillment of the terms of the plot allotment containing the original allotment. Some part of the allotment was made to the applicant. The Authority was granted full payment and, on the direction of the Chief Minister, the appeal of the applicant justifying the cancellation of the applicant's allotment was granted whether the applicant was allowed to hear before the plot allotment was canceled. Right or not? ; Did the High Court think that it was not necessary to hear the petitioner before the cancellation order of the plot was approved? Even if the award given by the arbitrator is not made a court rule, it has received a legal value. And whether the authority constituted under section 4 (4), established under the Punjab Development of States Act, 1976, is entitled to order the allotment / cancellation of the plot coming under the jurisdiction of the respective Development Authority and to the Chief Minister. no.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Nilam lawyer