SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB, FORESTRY, WILDLIFE AND TOURISM DEPARTMENT, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD MASOOD
Punjab Civil Servant (Qualification & Discipline) Rules 1975 R 4 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Government employee failed to deduct income tax from auction buyer for certain amount during his employment, Government employee's retirement After such money was summoned, the government could retrieve the government's employment on the basis of admissibility which was paid to the government employees by the service tribunal. It did not dispute that the government department against the government employees. Government employees (competence and discipline) did not take action under the Rules 1975, so the government employee should take the proposed action. In this case, no exemption can be taken on the order of the service tribunal to set aside the collection of the alleged money from the public servant and instruct the department authority to do so. He must first act according to the law. En There is no question about the recovery of the amount of public employee's commitment to public ????? Law of public importance arises
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Sahiwal lawyer