Find a Lawyer

SAJJAD AHMED JAVED BHATTI versus SECRETARY, ESTABLISHMENT DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

The Civil Servants Act 1973 Section 18 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) of the civil servants' former appeal service were dismissed before the Tribunal and the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court also met the failure before a public servant's review request for his seniority. Government employees again approached the service tribunal under Section 12 (2), CPC, so that the allegations were based on fraud. Put aside your first decision / order related to this senility but no. The Judicial decision in the preliminary proceedings of the Service Tribunal and the Supreme Court was based on the Central Selection Board's refusal to refuse to clear them for development in Grade 19, resulting in no error in the order of the service tribunal or the Supreme Court. I justify the action that followed. Section 12 (2), a government employee seeking review of the earlier orders of a service tribunal under CPC, thus, no exemption on the untimely order passed by the service trustee can be obtained. As a civil servant, Ibn Ishtal will not be rejected if he would otherwise have been entitled to a relief at the department level under the law, his leave of appeal would have been denied in the circumstances. best advocate from Head Marala lawyer