ATTA MUHAMMAD versus MATLOOB ALAM KHAN
Conan e-Martyrdom Order 1984 Article 401 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Natural Justice, the statement of the witness before it, the effect of the non-confrontation of his witness in his earlier statement of a witness Could not specify. Without confronting this statement, it was considered for the purpose of inconsistency where the seller entered the witness box but a copy of that statement presented to him cannot be taken by the court because no one has Should also not be heard. The principle of natural justice requires that the individual should be impressed with his first statement and provide an opportunity to explain his position in the light of his statement before making a negative indication. Thus, the Natural Justice High Court and the First Appellate Court justified. The following disputed courts did not commit any illegal move in the statements under consideration and in their assessment, excluding the disputed statement. What, the fact is that the present findings of the First Appellate Court and the High Court cannot be interfered with. Appeal was denied only on leave
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for fresh advocates from Sarai Alamgir lawyer