PAKISTAN TOURISM DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION versus MUHAMMAD SALEEM
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 West Pakistan Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance (VII 1968) Ordinance (VII 1968), Section O 15 (4) Employees dismissed who were found to be involved in cash termination / misuse. He was and after starting an inquiry against him, he was dismissed from the job in which he was found guilty. No fault was found in the inquiry proceedings as it was impartial and the employees had a fair opportunity to participate in the inquiry. But the employee was not only criminally minded because he had forged his signature Did. His officer with a view to accusing him of time, but also an arrogant and disobedient man, who consciously demonstrated his humiliating behavior even before the Labor Appellate Tribunal employee. Made fun of and mocked And in such cases, refusing to allow the employer's advice to proceed with the Labor Court, it was wrong to order such employee to be re-paid, ordering the reinstatement of the employee approved by the Labor Court, in the circumstances, Was kept separately.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
