BASHIR AHMAD versus SINDH AGRICULTURAL SUPPLIES ORGANISATION
Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969 Section 25 A Workman's Compensation Act (VIII of 1923), Section 2 (i) (n) solicited a re-advance by a cell inspector on the basis that a worker's complaint was resisted. Not an employee, but was. Government employee While the employee claimed he was a worker as described in Schedule II to Section 2 (1) (n), Workmen's Compensation Act 1923, the question involved in this case was a mixed question of law and fact. Which can only be. The case decided by leading evidence was remanded to the Labor Court to decide whether the employee was a worker or a civil servant in light of the evidence contained by the parties in this case.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
