Find a Lawyer

NOOR MUHAMMAD NOOR versus MUHAMMAD AZHAR, MANAGER, DAILY \'JANG QUETTA

Newspaper Employees (Terms of Service) Act 1973 Section 13 (6) Implementing Tribunal for Newspaper Employees (Procedures and Duties) Rules, 1977, R9 Paying the Pay Act (IV 1936), Section 2 Wage Night Shift Allowance and Pension Interaction ? Every year two employees for Hajj, a rightful employer union, claim that employees in the Establishment deserve the Night Shift Allowance as first given in the Wage Board Award and later confirmed in the Awards Employees Union. To be sent to at least two employees. Hajj and its employees should also be paid pension through drawings every year, rejecting the demand of the employees union in connection with the night shift allowance, saying that such demand was misunderstood because the adviser It was not accepted and there was a night shift allowance. No salaried employees were entitled to the Night Shift Allowance in 1961, the First Wage Board Award, and was entitled to the Wage Board Award, issued in 1974, 1980, 1985, and in 1991, employees were primarily awarded to Knight employees. Refusing to pay the shift allowance, the Wage Adviser in its report issued in 1980 in the Third Wage Board Award said that there was no justification for it. Allowing the night shift allowance as per the demand of the employees as night shift was a routine feature of the job for which they get paid their wages and the night shift allowance did not fall within the scope of the term / wages. I was suffering from depression. The Wage Advisor's opinion was not accepted at the final award, and the employees were particularly encouraged by the employer's night shift allowance argument. best law firm from Upper Deval lawyer