AL-HAMZA SHIP BREAKING COMPANY versus GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN
Income Tax Ordinance 1979 Section 50 (5) (b) Inspection, Valuation and Evaluation of Import Equipment Rules, 1994, R8 (2) (c) Import Duty Compensation (On Scrapping Ships) Rules, 1993, R4 [ Amended by the Finance Act, 1995) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Section 50 (5), Income Tax Ordinance, 1979 and 34% of the tax abatement to abolish entry tax advance tax at a specified rate The first installment of the duty was paid on different dates, before 30 30 1995, when additional advance income tax was imposed by the Financial Act 1995 when the applicants claimed that they had paid customs duty before the target. Advance paid income tax rate on the value of certain aircraft increased creation. On the date of 30th, 1995, hence, under the Income Tax Ordinance, Section 50 (5), on the declaration of the Finance Act, 1995 effect collector, from the responsibility of payment of additional advance income tax at a specified rate after 1 7 1995. Was completely deleted. 1979, it was necessary to calculate the e-advance income tax during the same period and at the same time, neither before nor after, in the same way in which customs duty and sales tax were collected, thus, the cost of imported goods. Based on the customs duty to be charged, and the sales tax, the customs department operated at a rate that existed at the time of allowing the importer to pay applicants to the state exchequer without the full payment of the first installment, That is, 34% of the import duty, however, had no option but to be submitted without the permission of the collector; advance on the assessment of customs duty. Income tax was fixed on which he himself worked, Applicants were required to comply with the provisions of Section 50 (5).
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate for immigration from Jatoi lawyer