Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIULLAH KHAN versus FAUJI POLYPROPYLENE PRODUCTS

Section 25A & 38 (3) employer's failure to pay l housing costs payable to the appellant from 1986 to 31st 1993, the Complaint Petition Limit Competition Trial Court primarily applied to the applicant's complaint. Denied on the basis that the Labor Court had. There is no jurisdiction and this aggrieved person should have referred to the authority under the Payment of Wages Act. Employees were admitted due to failure to pay emplo residential costs pay 1 1 198 1986 to 31 12 1993 Notice was issued on January 8, 1995, under section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969 This fact was not denied by the employees - according to the way the employees were initially refused to pay the resident allowance pay, on August 1, 1986, every subsequent month The latest cause of action arose, therefore, was such refusal / short payment or non-payment within a specified period under section 25A, Industrial Relations Ordinance, 1969. Yagi can be searched. Each of the other independent reasons for the payment of a cost allowance payment, from 1986 to 1986 to 31 12 1993, was established on March 14, 1995, on the claim of the appellant even if the jurisdiction of the Labor Court. The authority was also explicitly banned. Over time, witnesses have clearly acknowledged that they were receiving a cost allowance during this period as calculated by the employer complaint, therefore, without the employee being merit No substance was appealed against the dismissal of the claim, in which case it was rejected. how to become a advocate from Hafizabad lawyer