ZUBEDA BIBI versus SELECTION COMMITTEE
Prospect of Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951 Section 17 Bolan Medical College, Quetta Jur Academic Sessions 1990 1991, para 28 and 37 (Explanation) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 on the basis of his father's Domicile Certificate denied entry to the Appellant. District Magistrate, Quetta, when Chaman was a part of this district and then the district was divided into Quetta and Pishin districts, and Chaman was added to Pishin Appellate District. Father had previously maintained the Domicile Certificate and was named Pishin. The district selection committee did not receive its new domicile certificate. Because of his ancestral certificate, the appellant was denied entry, which stated that Chaman was appellant's permanent residence, yet Chaman was included in Pishin district and no domicile certificate was presented from that district. Was denied the constitutional application of the appellants against the refusal of admission by the part of the father of the appellants who did not apply for the latest Domicile Certificate of the High Court Validity Lips o District Pashin, which was not specific to the District Pashin Appeal against the seat was guaranteed to be denied, even though the appellant as a confession And his father was serious about being part of the Pishin District Domicile Certificate, which was issued in 1973 and which is also valid for the area that now comes to Pishin District, without any opposition clause for that area. It would be permissible to exist otherwise the appellant refused entry in a way that was not legally sustainable. Both the appellant and the defendant are presently in the MB, B section for the fourth year.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
property advocates from Dera Ismail Khan lawyer