Find a Lawyer

IFTIKHARUL HASSAN SHAH versus IJAZ AHMED CHEEMA

Representing the election petition of Section 52 of the People's Act 1976, the petitioner's application of the evidence through various petitions alleges that the electoral record has been extensively repeated in connection with the re-counting with the officers of the Election Commission. In the re-counting the ballet papers were noted backwards with the national identification card numbers and the serial number of the voter list, on the basis that such ballot papers were presented as incorrect and unresponsive. It may be excluded from the count that the confidentiality vote of this privacy was ignored and that the election record may be interrupted at the time of re-counting or before re-counting. The Election Tribunal should allow the opening of packets and counters and then create a re-counting Election Tribunal, however, the re-counting report resulted in the elections being held during the hearing of the petition before him. Went through and excluded any miscellaneous requests. Responding to the request for witnesses to be examined in support of the evidence filed in the aforesaid petitions, the Election Tribunal also made negative comments on the witnesses' affidavit statements being presented to the Tribunal for examination without them. Accordingly, the witnesses' affidavits were not believed because they remained silent on the date of the polling until the Tribunal ordered that they be excluded or removed without recording evidence in the election petition till the date of re-counting. Be it, without resorting to the affidavit's resignations that were put on record In cross-examination for Membership tax advocates from FR DI Khan lawyer