Find a Lawyer

NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN versus MUHAMMAD AKRATTT KHAN

Constitution of Pakistan 1973 Article 187 (2) Applicant applying for the implementation, enforcement and implementation of a Supreme Court order under which the applicant was ordered to be promoted. The High Court upheld the constitutional request of the applicants. Accepted with only fruitful benefits - not all that resulted and from 4 to 26 vis after re-reviewing the previous benefits \ applicant's support section, including its sanity and progress and applicant's sanity. Cannot be approved nor can it be granted on the occasion of deletion of the respondents 4 to 26. Such an effect of the applicants themselves came from the fact that the grant of sanitation and promotion was at the discretion of the competent authority after considering various factors, including the rights of others, such as the rights of the respondents. The applicants, whose names were excluded as a result of the applicants' self-incrimination, have, therefore, ceased to claim promotion to the post and to which date they were entitled, especially Prime Minister Appellant ( After their development by the order of the Bank) it has been held that the issue of selection and appointment to the higher office was at special discretion. Authorized authority was retained until the point of the Supreme Court's decision was that it found that the applicant's basic complaint was dealt with by the appellant (the bank) through its order of development, however, If he was advised, his claim could extend his age. And promotion of a separate constitutional petition after the dismissal of all these officers us immigration advocates from Pannu aqil lawyer