In view of the value of the testimony of section 302/34, there was no prior hostility or motive for the witnesses to falsely implicate the accused in the murder case and the assailants had no possibility of any false identification and the witnesses were notorious. There was not enough medical evidence to do so. The motive behind the incident was the fact that all the accused went to the spot armed with deadly weapons, and their repeated molestation on the victim's body proved that their motive for committing the murder was that the ocular evidence contained major contradictions or contradictions and persistence. Were free from The conviction of the culprits of the accused was maintained under the superstitious reliance on all material points.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
