Find a Lawyer

WALAYAT SARWAR versus KAMAL

Part of the property sought under section 4 of the Partition Act 1893 section 4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), article 23, scope and provisions of section 4, Part A, 1893, should be a residential house which is Owned by a divided family. , The share of the partner should have been transferred to a person who was not a non-partisan family member, the distribution case should have been filed by alien transfer and. Members of the family should buy a share of the alien transfer of Section 4, Partition Act, 1893, as a shareholder in the property, because of the transfer of the share of the property from one of the partner to the alien, Disrupting the owner and their privacy and family affiliation only gives the right to buy a stranger's share in the house, while no such right was granted in relation to other properties, shops, plots, etc. 4, the Partition Act, 1893, cannot be applied to properties that were not specifically resident in the role The property, consisting of shops and residential units, therefore, by virtue of being comprehensive in nature, will not fail in the provisions of section 4 of the Partition Act, 1893. , Interpretation of the Partition Act 1893 should be such that no guarantees of torture are given to the citizens under Article 23 of the Constitution, subject to any reasonable restriction issued by law in the public interest under L.D. And the exchange of property, public interest, in relation to a non-residential family-owned residential home was limited to ensuring that the family's privacy was protected from the entry of a stranger into the family. ask a advocate free from Machh lawyer