Find a Lawyer

JAMILA AKHATAR versus CUSTODIAN EVACUEE PROPERTY

Purchase of property in the CCP Code Order XXII's CPC Implementation Orders and Orders O XXI, RR 92, 94 and 95 Litigation Act (IX of 1908), Arts 142 and 144 Court Auction The court ruled in its favor. The applicant's predecessor does not have the effect of delivering the possession of the applicant, not through the court, but through the private negotiation without the interference of the judicial effect which would have given the auction buyer (applicant) 0 XXI, R 94, CP Passes with the issuance of a sales certificate under c. Therefore, in the property, the property, the auction buyer's court, has refused to reject the declaration in connection with the house that the application under RJ 95 of the OJOCLCPC was barred while the possession. Has been banned under Article 142, Limitation Act 1908. Such an argument of the court was invalid, for Article 144, and Article 142 Limitation Act, 1908 was not applicable, there was nothing available on the record to indicate that J.K. The young lenders were at enmity with the auctioneer, but it would not be enough to deprive the owner of the property through negative possession, but after the court, the possession of the lender would be considered legitimate. It is entitled to take possession of all the property which their forefathers auctioned immigration advocates from Laliah lawyer