Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASHRAF versus GUL MAWAZ

Section 18 of the Ease of Life Act 1882 The defendant's right to access easement by prescription, based on the flow of rain water from his home, was the prerequisite for obtaining the right of access by the defendant to the house of the defendant. That such a right was secured, freely. The right, without any interference and failure to prove to the plaintiffs for more than 20 years that their right has been in the right, that is, the defendant's right to negatively exclude the plaintiff's rain water permit It cannot be understood that the water flowing from the defendant's house would not constitute a right of ease. Such drainage of water for more than twenty years should be proved to be adversarial and obstructive as there is no evidence of this effect. , Will not be considered for the right of ease. By the claimant by prescription best advocate from Taxila lawyer