ZAR WALI versus MUHAMMAD ILYAS
The decision of the suit components of the Code of Conduct 1908 Section 12 (2) and OI, R 8 and the certificate passed by the trial court and the certificate of appeal by the Court of Appeal were challenged under section 12 (2), CPC It was alleged that he condemned the strangers. There were several suits in this suit as they were seven in number, such persons had a common interest in the matter because the rights-of-rights case was properly obtained by the defendants and gave notice to all interested persons. Was granted and the court approached. There was nothing wrong with the method of public advertising through the drum beat, the provisions of the OI, R8, CPC were fully complied with when the plaintiffs in the case were neither private. As the case was brought, nor did the applicant's procedure name be suppressed. As such, it cannot be dismissed as either fraud or misrepresentation, especially when the applicant failed to provide the details of alleged fraud or misrepresentation in his application. Section 12 (2), cp. C
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
criminal advocate from Haveli Lakha lawyer