ZAITOON versus MUHAMMAD RIAZ
The witnesses designated in the FIR of the Criminal Code (CR PC) Section 497 (5) Contempt Code (XLV of 1860), Section 354A / 506/148/149 void / bail have fully confirmed this version of the Complainant Was accused of firing at the accused. His co-accused in the air helped remove his clothes and expose him to public view. The accused also robbed the complainant's clothes, which the witnesses had hidden with their dupatas, the first of the crime being committed by the accused. Section 4A4A, PPC, using the criminal force of aerial shootings and assisting a co-accused to complete the crime by completing its second part, all the accused illegally pursuing their common cause. Were gathered, there is no difference in their role. Those charged were covered under Article 497 (1), the CRPC Prohibition Clause, and there were reasons to believe that the magistrate had committed a criminal arbitrary offense in the grant. The accused's bail was not appropriate The bail was granted to the accused
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Allahabad lawyer