Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMADZUBAIRKIDWAI versus SECRETARY,ESTABLISHMENTDIVISION

The Section 4 seniority case of public servants for development from B20 to B21 was placed before the Central Selection Board (C Section B) at its previous meeting, but the civil servant was not cleared for development and It was recommended for a public servants sprint case. It was cleared by C-Section B at its next meeting and for promotion to B-21, and it was promoted accordingly, under which government employees were misled into a seniority position and because of their results. Represented against his previous appearance, which was accepted and the Prime Minister replaced as a competent authority. Resignation to dismiss government employees One of the government employees submitted a representation against some junior officers, including a civil servant, for restoration of his seniority, which was accepted under a memorandum under which the authorized authority turned over the postponement. The decision to revoke was dismissed and civil servants were dismissed in sanity, grieving at B21, the civil servant challenged the decision on the service tribunal's compatriate authority on the threshold of the civil servant. The facts of this endorsement were not disclosed in full before The order to convert the superintendent into a postponement was approved and in the second stage it was on the representation of the co-public servant. All the facts and papers were submitted to the competent authority through a summary prepared by the Establishment Secretary, and the deferred government employee said that once an order was passed in his favor, it was not returned. ask a advocate free from Kurram Agency lawyer