AZAD GOVERNMENT OF THE STATE OF J&K THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY versus MAJ.?GEN. (RTD.) MUHAMMAD HAYAT KHAN, MEMBER LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY, AZAD JAMMU AND KASHMIR
Appeal of Constitutional Appeal to the Supreme Court Articles 44 and 42 of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act 1974 Therefore, the High Court was justified in admitting that a constitutional application for a regular hearing of a constitutional petition only shows that a preliminary case has been presented but that does not mean that the court accepted the arguments. Where the question contained in the constitutional petition was a thorough examination of the facts or legal aspects of the case. Need it The court will not interfere in the appeal and will primarily have the hand in it. Resolve disputed points on the basis of The order of entry of a constitutional application, thus, cannot usually be chaired by the Supreme Court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
