Find a Lawyer

PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL CREDIT & INVESTMENT CORPORATION LTD. versus KALYAL KASHMIR TANNERIES LIMITED

Section 305 AZ Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VII of 1974) Section 42 directing the company to dismiss the High Court dismissing the request on the basis that the loan amount is in dispute as the parties disagree about the loan amount. And that there is a dispute over the interest rate of interest, compound interest and foreign interest rate, oral and documents on record, proof of justification, since the establishment of the company in 1979, up to the date of filing the application, The loan from the applicant corporation was not repaid while deciding whether the company in question was responsible for paying off its debt. Whether or not, whether the company was commercially located or not, whether the assets of the company exceeded its obligations, was not relevant to the court's section 305, Companies Ordinance, 1984 Company sub stratum questions I have to limit myself, it wasn't a long moment after I disappeared. It was possible for him to begin the operation, so the company's concurrence was a reasonable and reasonable solution that the High Court set aside the decision to refuse the company, and upon completing the prosecution, the Supreme Court directed the High Court. Remand was given. property advocate from Kunri lawyer